Censoring content on the Internet removes the ubiquity that it has introduced. Censorship takes a number of forms -- everywhere from the filter used in a school to the Great Firewall of China. Violation of Rights The Internet is protected by the First Amendment in the United States, though this obviously does not apply in all countries; additionally, schools and companies can make their own rules for their networks. However, in places where free speech is a right, the Internet is protected by it.
Censorship The First Amendment in Schools: Censorship is not easy to define. In many countries, censorship is most often directed at political ideas or criticism of the government.
Advocates for censorship often target materials that discuss sexuality, religion, race and ethnicity—whether directly or indirectly. Others think schools are wrong to allow discussion about sexual orientation in sex education or family life classes, and others would eliminate The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn from the English curriculum because of racial references.
Most pressures for censorship come from parents who disapprove of language or ideas that differ from or affront their personal views and values, but demands can emerge from anywhere across the religious, ideological, and political spectrum. Many demands appear motivated by anxiety about changing social conditions and traditions.
Feminism, removal of prayer from schools, the emergence of the gay rights movement, and other trends with implications for family structure and personal values, have all generated calls for censorship. Censorship demands require educators to balance First Amendment obligations and principles against other concerns — such as maintaining the integrity of the educational program, meeting state education requirements, respecting the judgments of professional staff, and addressing deeply held beliefs in students and members of the community.
Pursuant to these principles, lower courts generally defer to the professional judgments of educators. As discussed in Fact Sheet 8, this sometimes means that the courts will uphold a decision to remove a book or to discipline a teacher, if it appears to serve legitimate educational objectives, including administrative efficiency.
However, administrators and educators who reject demands for censorship are on equally strong or stronger grounds. Most professional educational organizations strongly promote free expression and academic freedom as necessary to the educational process.
It is highly improbable that a school official who relied on these principles and refused to accede to pressures to censor something with educational value would ever be ordered by a court of law to do so. There are practical and educational as well as legal reasons to adhere as closely as possible to the ideals of the First Amendment.
School districts such as Panama City, Florida and Hawkins County, Tennessee have been stunned to find that acceding to demands for removal of a single book escalated to demands for revising entire classroom reading programs.
Other jurisdictions have been pressed to revise the science curriculum, the content of history courses, sex education, drug and alcohol education, and self-esteem programs.
Experience has shown far too many times that what appears to be capitulation to a minor adjustment can turn into the opening foray of a major curriculum content battle involving warring factions of parents and politicians, teachers, students and administrators.
Distinguishing Censorship from Selection: Teachers, principals, and school administrators make decisions all the time about which books and materials to retain, add or exclude from the curriculum.
They are not committing an act of censorship every time they cross a book off a reading list, but if they decide to remove a book because of hostility to the ideas it contains, they could be.
As long as they were not motivated by hostility to the idea of teaching about evolution, this would not ordinarily be deemed censorship. The choice to include the material in the fourth grade curriculum tends to demonstrate this was a pedagogical judgment, not an act of censorship.
Not every situation is that simple. On closer examination, it is clear their concern is not that students will not understand the material, but that the objecting adults do not want the students to have access to this type of information at this age.
If professional educators can articulate a legitimate pedagogical rationale to maintain such material in the curriculum, it is unlikely that an effort to remove it would be successful. Most people do not consider it censorship when they attempt to rid the school of material that they think is profane or immoral, or when they insist that the materials selected show respect for religion, morality, or parental authority.
School officials who accede to demands to remove materials because of objections to their views or content may be engaging in censorship. Efforts to suppress a disfavored view or controversial ideas are educationally unsound and constitutionally suspect. The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.
Society of Sisters, U.
Yet profanity appears in many worthwhile books, films and other materials for the same reasons many people use it in their everyday language—for emphasis or to convey emotion. But even minor use of profanity has not shielded books from attack. Profanity, however, is only one of many grounds on which books are challenged.The Negative Effects of Technology on Youth Today Marlena Ramirez Grand island Senior High School John A., and Katelyn Y.
“The Internet and Social Life.” Annual Reviews of Psychology. Annual Reviews, Web. 22 technology does have a negative effect on youth today in ways such as emotionally, relationships, education.
Keywords: Media, Internet usage, Positive Youth Development, Malaysia. Introduction. Lack of information creates a negative impact on our lives, particularly on the educated layer of society.
The new media is one of the most important mass media in the world and it changes the world in many aspects.
The Internet has made the world a smaller place. Censoring content on the Internet removes the ubiquity that it has introduced. Censorship takes a number of forms -- everywhere from the filter.
The media today is having a profound effect on society, especially its youth. Censorship Words | 3 Pages. INTERNET ON MODERN YOUTH The content of the current media culture is often blind to a young person’s cultural,economic and educational background.
When internet censorship comes into play it makes a impact on how users can have a web experience. Governments that are more like dictatorships have begun to censor the internet and even manipulating it to shape the minds of their citizens in a way comparable to propaganda.
Adolescents and the Internet by Nathalie Louge October Continued on page 2 of American youth, ages 12 to 17, use the Internet, and nearly half log on daily (Lenhart, Madden, & Hitlin, ).
Although be aware of its impact on adolescent behavior, well-being, and development.